![]() An early article was the first to demonstrate persuasively that alcohol taxes have a direct effect on the death rate of heavy drinkers, and subsequent research demonstrated the moderate efficacy of minimum-purchase-age laws in preventing fatal crashes. Over much of his career, one strand of Cook’s research concerns the prevention of alcohol-related problems through restrictions on alcohol availability. He also has ongoing projects on education policy and academic performance, with recent publications on starting age for public schools, and on how lead exposure affects academic performance and delinquency. He is co-director of the NBER Work Group on the Economics of Crime, and co-editor of a NBER volume on crime prevention. He served as vice chair of the National Research Council’s Committee on Law and Justice.Ĭook's primary focus at the moment is the economics of crime. He has served in a variety of capacities with the National Academy of Sciences, including membership on expert panels dealing with alcohol-abuse prevention, violence, school shootings, underage drinking, the deterrent effect of the death penalty, and proactive policing. Department of Treasury (Enforcement Division). Department of Justice (Criminal Division) and to the U.S. In 2001 he was elected to membership in the National Academy of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.Ĭook joined the Duke faculty in 1973 after earning his PhD from the University of California, Berkeley. Cook is an honorary Fellow in the American Society of Criminology. He served as director and chair of Duke’s Sanford Institute of Public Policy from 1985-89, and again from 1997-99. ![]() Cook is ITT/Sanford Professor Emeritus of Public Policy and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University. Public policy acts on nonprofits to shape people’s civic engagement, as Carolyn Barnes, Deondra Rose, and I demonstrate in Policy Studies Journal.Philip J. Might big philanthropists be donors for democracy ? Jeffrey Berry and I have an early take in our symposium in Interest Groups & Advocacy. These activist women have a lot of history on which to draw, as I show in this volume celebrating the 19th Amendment. One hundred years after suffrage, American women are spearheading a great political reformation, as I argue in the Preface to the 2nd ed. And the landmark Heller ruling may not have been such a big deal (as Matthew Lacombe and I illustrate). The “missing movement” for gun reform is no longer missing , as I document in Gun Studies: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Policy, Politics, and Practice(co-edited with Jennifer Carlson and Harel Shapira). Here are my thoughts on the political meaning of the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. My CV is here.Ĭoncerned about gun violence, gun policy, and gun politics? Everything you need to know is in the new edition of The Gun Debate(with Philip Cook 2020). How and why do everyday Americans get involved in public life? Whose voices are heard – and whose are not? Why does political engagement matter? I examine these questions by looking at reform movements (e.g., for gun violence prevention) at social groups (e.g., women) and at support structures (e.g., policy-minded donors). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |